The Washington Post vs. Buzzfeed

Front Page News: The Washington Post vs. Buzzfeed

I decided to compare The Washington Post and the Buzzfeed due to the professionalism of both of the side by side. You can tell that there is more professionalism and views are going to take The Washington Post more truthfully rather than Buzzfeed due to the layout, font, picture, grammar, and the titles that are located just on the front page of both of them as you can tell from below. Would someone rather read “The Teenager Who Egged A Senator For Comments About The Muslim Community Has Given His First Interview” from Buzzfeed or this “Australia’s ‘egg boy’ says he ‘united people.’ Scientists may have cracked why.” from The Washington Post. I would say that The Washington Post is going to get more views because it has the views questioning more and more intrigued in the story rather than the Buzzfeed one. You can read more about this article at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/03/25/australias-egg-boy-says-he-united-people-scientists-may-have-cracked-why/?utm_term=.6c1786e1ea94.

[2 image, 1 links, 2 quotation, 239 words]

Onibada, Ade. “The Teenager Who Egged A Senator For Comments About The Muslim Community Has Given His First Interview.” BuzzFeed, BuzzFeed, 25 Mar. 2019, www.buzzfeed.com/adeonibada/egg-boy-fraser-anning-christchurch.

Noack, Rick. “Australia's 'Egg Boy' Says He 'United People.' Scientists May Have Cracked Why.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 25 Mar. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/03/25/australias-egg-boy-says-he-united-people-scientists-may-have-cracked-why/?utm_term=.6c1786e1ea94.